On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> If you think that two separate wxgtk
> versions are really necessary please speak now because Ron is preparing
> packages for a new version.
Just to be completely clear about this, I almost certainly will
not consider hav
ve no idea
about it's stability. What I'm interested in figuring out is which
version we should be concerned with getting into Woody.
And No I'm not repackaging wxPython, all this is just about is which
version of python I install on my build machine to build the next
.debs with.
thanks,
Ron
ne.
I'll file a request at ftp-admin if no-one listening pings me that they've
already removed them :-)
cheers,
Ron
e kept out of testing by toolchain failures on hppa and ppc,
and (newly) also on m68k.
I'm not sure what else to do now except be patient until they are
fixed. I don't think there is anything I can do in wx to fix these
problems.
Ron
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 02:25:39PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> wxwindows2.4
>
> This one doesn't build with the current binutils on hppa and
> powerpc. I'll upload packages for hppa built with the binutils found
> at http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/binutils/, unles
;d be grateful.
(and less likely to mess things up for you guys in the future :)
thanks,
Ron
(please CC on any replies, I'm not on the deb-python list)
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:45:13PM -0600, Matthias Klose wrote:
...
> To help python2.3 to enter the testing (sarge) release as the defa
less there is another upload of python2.3 before all this
makes it into testing.
Thanks!
Ron
that I'll rebuild
the packages with just their needs in mind. I've not yet heard from
anyone definitely unable to migrate to 2.3, but I've been expecting
there will be at least a couple of (hopefully minor) issues there.
Migrating packages to 2.3/2.4 for sarge is definitely my prefe
e
> documentations in main without building, as upstream tarball includes
> documentations in compiled HTML format.
Are compiled html files also compressed?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-p
problems - not removing
Errors were encountered while processing:
python2.3
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/06 06:02, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 10/21/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/21/06 05:13, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/06 07:27, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 10/21/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Unless you haven't updated in a while, the only one (of the three)
>> > strictly requiring python2.3 is bit
question is : will the generated .pyc and .pyo files
> still work if the major python version changes ? For now, I have put a
> dependency on python2.1, but it may not be necessary.
If possible, pPlease make the dependancy ">= python 2.1".
--
+-----
; with others, it is better to have real TABs instead of spaces.
This is amusing: I think exactly the opposite, since I indent
every 4 columns, and if \t were set to 4, then when less'ing
the file, it would look differently that it does in the editor...
--
+-----
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 16:09, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 15:27, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > [snip]
> >> I'm a bit annoyed with Emacs when editing Python programs because
> >> Emacs a
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 01:40, Jonne Itkonen wrote:
> On 21 May 2002, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 15:27, Jérôme Marant wrote:
[snip]
> And now something useful: less has an option '-x' which tells less how
> many spaces to use when rendering tabs.
python museum on the net. I'll propose it's removal after the next
> release.
--
-
Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jefferson, LA USA
Regarding war zones: "There's nothing sacrosanct about a hotel
with a bunch of journalists in it."
Marine Lt. Gen. Bernard E. Trainor (Retired)
On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 06:07 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> For those who may be concerned: this mail is sent to
[snip]
>
> What do you think about this? Is this a good idea? If it is a good idea,
I don't know about anyone else, but I appreciate it.
--
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
; a solution).
> sam$
>
> Do you know how I am supposed to get my "system" upto 2.4?
>
> Flup in this case supposedly only functions properly on Python2.4
Making a symlink from python2.4 to python would probably do the trick.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Coin,
>
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Making a symlink from python2.4 to python would probably do the
>> trick.
>
> Are you root of the world and gonna do this ug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> python-flup is not an official package (yet?), so what's wrong
>> with giving a bit of an ad-hoc work-around?
>
> Because we'll
using something less
> problematic (probably Gtk). Maybe I just hit too much corner
> cases, but wxWidgets brought me too much pain and workarounds in
> my code.
Do you remember any examples?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it i
9]\+\).*/\1/'`
>
> which works in principle but I wonder if there is some other reasonable
> way.
$ PYVER=`python -c \
'import platform; print platform.python_version()'`
$ echo $PYVER
2.3.5
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" real
23 matches
Mail list logo
