Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

2012-03-20 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Hi, I've started working on packaging python-mpd2 which is a fork of python-mpd [0]. I've mainly followed the guide on the wiki [1]. * Package name: python-mpd2 Version : 0.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Jörg Thalheim * URL : https://github.com/Mic92/python-mpd2 * License

Re: Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

2012-03-20 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Hi, Thanks for the review Jakub :) Le 20/03/2012 17:00, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Geoffroy Youri Berret , 2012-03-20, 15:50: >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-mpd2/python-mpd2_0.4.0-1.dsc I did paste the wrong link :/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/py

Re: Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

2012-03-21 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
future (waiting at least for wheezy+1). Le 21/03/2012 00:16, Fernando Lemos a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Geoffroy Youri Berret > wrote: >> Le 20/03/2012 17:00, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > […] I recommend that you consider the following: > > * Is the python-mpd upst

Re: Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

2012-03-21 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Hi Simon, Le 21/03/2012 13:13, Simon McVittie a écrit : > On 20/03/12 23:16, Fernando Lemos wrote: > If the fork is just python-mpd with a few patches (as he states in the > upstream bug report), one option for moving forward is to review those > patches, check that they are as correct as they can

Re: RFS: python3-dateutil

2012-03-24 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Hi Thomas, I'm not a DD, therefore I cannot sponsor your package, here is my review nonetheless. Le 24/03/2012 03:39, Thomas Kluyver a écrit : > Hi all, >[…] > > Package name: python3-dateutil > Version : 2.0-2 > Upstream Author : Gustavo Niemeyer > URL : http://labix.o

Re: RFS: python3-dateutil

2012-03-24 Thread Geoffroy Youri Berret
Le 24/03/2012 13:29, Thomas Kluyver a écrit : >> What is the license of zoneinfo-2011d.tar.gz ? > > The packaging deletes it, so I'd assumed it doesn't need license > information. Upstream doesn't mention anything specific, and looking > at python-dateutil, there's no license information for it th