Kevin Coyner wrote:
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyexcelerator
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
> contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyexc
Matthias Klose wrote:
> python2.3-lasso (not yet converted?)
In NEW queue.
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I announced :
> > python2.3-lasso (not yet converted?)
>
> In NEW queue.
Matthias, why did you just upload a new version totally removing
Python support ?
I confess I missed 377800 and 380851 but this was *days* ago. I had
been responsive on your previous email, why didn't you ask me ?
Al
> As you may noticed ;), most of the Debian packages now use Perl in their
> build-time and install-time scripts.
I don't care about build-time but care about install-time.
> Why is this? Perhaps, we can make some version of python to be
> "default" (Just like we do now with 2.1), and make it a b
Matthias Klose wrote :
> Next Monday, I will file reports for `ftp.debian.org' to remove above
> mentioned packages from Debian unstable. They all have filed at least
> one serious bug report, that they are not installable in the current
> unstable distribution.
I just NMU'ed python-tal to DELAYE
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote :
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:22:22AM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > I just NMU'ed python-tal to DELAYED/3-days
>
> Who told you?
> Who asked you?
Matthias Klose asked. Several times. Last call is:
http://lists.debian.
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote :
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-12
> Severity: normal
>
> Lack of good manners is something that i cannot stand, but i've to see when
> i'm not helping any more.
I don't agree with your judgement but if you've been working on
python
Hi,
python-tal is maintained by the QA team so I thought I'd help and NMU
it.
I added a python2.3-tal package and it built correctly but the
no-version package (python-tal) still depends upon python2.2-tal (I
changed Build-depends-indep to python (>= 2.3), python (<< 2.4) ).
Where did I miss the
Josselin Mouette wrote :
> What version of python is installed on your system ? Your packages built
> fine on my system and made python-tal depend on python2.3-tal as
> expected.
Great. I had python 2.3 installed but not yet as default python
version (waiting for python-bsddb3). I don't have ac
severity 357620 normal
tag 357620 unreproducible
thanks
Ian MacDonald wrote:
> Package: gnome-blog
> Version: 0.9-3
> Severity: grave
>
> Something changed. I miss gnome-blog, its just so convienent.
>
>
> ~$ gnome-blog-poster
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/gnome-blog
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> My libgpod package didn't appear in the list because it currently only
> builds an python2.3-gpod and no python-gpod at all. Feel free to NMU
> this package as I really have no idea about that whole python modules
My python2.3-lasso package didn't appear either; I shoul
11 matches
Mail list logo
