It sounds good to me. I think the admin should have the option of
setting the symlinks to default to 1.5 or 2.0.
-D
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 03:04:33PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
|
[snip proposal for multiple version installation]
| --
| Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
solution that's fine as well.
-D
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 06:31:31PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
| D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > It sounds good to me. I think the admin should have the option of
| > setting the symlinks to default to 1.5 or 2.0.
|
| Sorry, I can&#
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 08:53:39AM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
| D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > If you have a different solution that's fine as well.
|
| The whole stuff is handled by alternatives.
| See update-alternatives manpage.
|
Oh, ok. Another part of the
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:16:51AM -0600, Rob Tillotson wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
| > And thanks to a small change in the interpreter, the current version
| > looks for modules in /usr/lib/python//site-packages and
| > then /usr/lib/python/site-package. Other modules
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 12:32:02PM -0800, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:01:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > What I want is if we allow both Python 1.5 _and_ Python 2.0 to be
| > So we need
| > ...
|
| No, we don't. Python already installs its modules into
|
| $
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 11:44:48AM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
[snip]
|
| I then went and look at the source rpm. They have this patch in there:
|
| --- Python-1.5.2/Python/importdl.c.global Sat Jul 17 16:52:26 1999
| +++ Python-1.5.2/Python/importdl.cSat Jul 17 16:53:19 1999
| @@ -441,13 +44
I think this sounds good. Then users who don't want to use the extra
disk space don't have to.
There is another tradeoff though. I compared the size of several .py
and the corresponding .pyc files from the standard library and noticed
that the .pyc file is a little bit larger. If the user li
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:25:52PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
| Steve Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > Licenses aside, there are the same technical issues with Python 2.1
| > as with Python 2.0.
|
| Python 2.1 seems to print some diagnostic messages during run-time;
| this might affec
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:17:40PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
| Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| [Python warning messages]
|
| > Could you mail an example of such a message ?
|
| y = None
| def fun():
| y = None
| def bar():
| y
| bar()
|
| fun()
|
| result
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:43:08PM +0100, Aquarius wrote:
| In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
| > I just browsed /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, and indeed there are plenty of
| > scripts that use "#!/usr/bin/env python". If we consider the possibility
| > that somebody installs non-compatible Pyth
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:44:33AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
| To add to the multiple python versions confusion:
| jython recently appeared in debian.
| To make things correctly, it should be possible to
| use it as replacement of python, and also it should be
| possible to have both python an
Last night I had an idea for organizing multiple python versions in
Debian.
o all core (the interpreter) python packages will be versioned
ex
python-1.5.2
python-2.0
python-2.1.1
Each of these will contain /usr/bin/pythonX.Y.Z and "provide"
'python'.
/u
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:30:28PM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
| On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 03:25:20PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
| ...
| > o The #! line should look something like
| > #!/usr/bin/deb_py_ver 1.5.2 -
|
| I can't get things like this to work. It seems one parameter a
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 06:27:20PM -0400, David M. Cooke wrote:
| At some point, D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:30:28PM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
| > | On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 03:25:20PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
| > | ...
| > | > o Th
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:27:55AM +1200, Carey Evans wrote:
| D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > o all core (the interpreter) python packages will be versioned
| > ex
| > python-1.5.2
| > python-2.0
| > python-2.1.1
| >
| > Each
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 01:30:17AM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
| On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 07:05:17PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
| ...
| > Ok, sure, replace the space separator between the versions with a
| > different ASCII separator.
|
| Won't do either, as this would make it impossi
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 01:07:21PM +1200, Carey Evans wrote:
| D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Sure, but also consider older packages. For example, we are now
| > moving to 2.0 (or 2.1) for the "default" python. We still want to
| > provide 1.5.2 versions of a
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 04:05:56PM +1200, Carey Evans wrote:
| D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > Yes. Maybe each extension should just depend on a single version of
| > python and need to be rebuilt for each new python release.
|
| It makes things considerably simpler, from
18 matches
Mail list logo
