Package review request

/usr/bin/env python' in scripts generated by setuptools. Curently this is fixed with `sed -i'. I wonder if there is a better solution. I really would like to hear your opinions on this. Thanks in advance. -- with best regards, Andriy Senkovych -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: another request for upgrade

ashisms. >>     [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/buildbot >>     [2]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/buildbot-slave -- WBR, Andriy Senkovych -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: another request for upgrade

every 2-3 days on IRC with no reply. In case you didn't get those I'm writing now. Hope I'll get package review soon. I kindly ask you to hurry up a bit because if not we'll be late on this package delivery forever (0.8.4 is coming soon). -- WBR, Andriy Senkovych -- To UNSUBSCR

Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

[4]: https://github.com/jollyroger/debian-buildbot [5]: https://github.com/jollyroger/debian-buildbot-slave [6]: http://buildbot.homeous.org.ua -- WBR, Andriy Senkovych -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

eans that I could need double number of repositories to support a single number of distros. So its even worse. Maybe I missed something and git-buildpackage could manage first case better than I think? Or is there could be some way to improve git-buildpackage with some generous features to make