On 18/03/25 12:19, Stuart Prescott wrote:
When I saw the list yesterday, it showed dozens and dozens of packages running
tests. In my previous upload where there
was a bug, I saw around 20 or so packages failing.
There's only 5 there, likely because it is bad display or things that passed do
n
On 18 March 2025 5:43:41 am IST, Alexandre Detiste
wrote:
>Le lun. 17 mars 2025 à 03:56, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
>> I will check the pseudo-excuses on britney in around week. Hopefully, this
>> upload should solve majority of issues.
>
>Only five autopkgtest failing and already two packages fixed
Hi Stuart,
On 18/03/25 12:01, Stuart Prescott wrote:
On 18/03/2025 11:13, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Le lun. 17 mars 2025 à 03:56, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
I will check the pseudo-excuses on britney in around week. Hopefully, this
upload should solve majority of issues.
Only five autopkgtest
On 18 March 2025 5:43:41 am IST, Alexandre Detiste
wrote:
>Le lun. 17 mars 2025 à 03:56, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
>> I will check the pseudo-excuses on britney in around week. Hopefully, this
>> upload should solve majority of issues.
>
>Only five autopkgtest failing and already two packages fixed
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 14:08 +0100, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> >
>
> some news ?
>
> friendly ping :))
I was waiting to see if I could get some advice from upstream.
I added a bit more to the upstream bug about what's different between
llvm 15 and 19 for one of the failing test.
https:/
5 matches
Mail list logo
