Hi,
Am 20.01.25 um 21:47 schrieb Jeremy Stanley:
On 2025-01-20 08:18:16 + (+), Schöke, Karsten wrote:
[...]
is the PSF license DFSG compliant?
[...]
IANAL, but https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ mentions it.
Licenses currently found in Debian main include:
[...]
Python Software
On Tuesday, 21 January 2025 15:53:24 CET Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>
> The size of the license text is rather short compared to the current
> version of PSF-2.0.
I presume that by PSF-2.0 you mean the licensing details found in debian/
copyright that largely reproduce the summary here:
https://do
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
On Thu, 05 Sep 2024 at 16:58:05 +0200, stefa...@debian.org wrote:
> This package failed build from source when test-built against a version of
> dh-python without a python3-setuptools dependency.
How can this be reproduced?
Hi,
Thomas Ward wrote on 21/01/2025 at 00:32:07+0100:
> Hello, Python Team!
>
> My name is Thomas Ward, and I'm a Debian Maintainer on a few
> packages. I'd like to join the Debian Python team.
>
> My reasoning for joining is because I am in the process of working on
> an ITP [1] for a Python li
PEB:
I actually replied to Bo YU's request last night, but I guess it never reached
here.
I accept the policies as written and will work within their timeframes on work
and tasks.
(This does not change the 2-week readiness timeline I have for repolib as an
ITP which I stated to Bo YU last nig
5 matches
Mail list logo
