Re: renewed python-sigstore packaging work

2024-12-10 Thread Simon Josefsson
Louis-Philippe Véronneau writes: > On 2024-12-06 10 h 57 a.m., Simon Josefsson wrote: >> stefa...@debian.org writes: >> >>> Hi Simon (2024.12.05_22:48:05_+) I'd appreciate help and collaborators on this! >>> >>> Feel free to add me as an uploader. >> Thank you! Added. >> >>> I think t

Re: Removing inactive non-DD or non-DM accounts from the DPT on Salsa

2024-12-10 Thread Alexandru Mihail
This could be a very nice and elegant solution, utilising the Guest role. I second this. Debate about using these roles (albeit different roles) took place here also: https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/12/msg00031.html > > I have no strong opinion on this but in other teams I've set ina

Bug#1089649: lintian: does not complain about trailing comma in Maintainer field

2024-12-10 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Package: lintian Version: 2.120.0 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: hert...@debian.org, daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org, debian-common-l...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org, The Maintainer field is only allowed to have a single contact. When you put two, you get a "too-many-contac

Re: Removing inactive non-DD or non-DM accounts from the DPT on Salsa

2024-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 09:59:20AM -0500 schrieb Louis-Philippe Véronneau: > The attached list (CSV: Name, username) are people that are neither DMs nor > DDs that haven't contributed since 2021. I'm proposing to remove them from > the team. I have no strong opinion on this but in other teams I've

Re: pypandoc: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.13

2024-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, CCing bug #1088768 since the description fits despite the bug itself is different - not sure whether reopen or new bug is the better option. It turns out that in debci there is a remaining test suite issue[1]: 58s tests.py ...Fs..s. [10

Re: pypandoc: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.13

2024-12-10 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:18:01AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > CCing bug #1088768 since the description fits despite the bug itself is > different - not sure whether reopen or new bug is the better option. > > It turns out that in debci there is a remaining test suite issue[1]: > [1] h