> >Fair enough. I also made that change.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott K
You have my +1 with the current wording.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 05:14:33PM +0200, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Maybe we indeed want a "minimal" autopkgtest environment, but many
> > upstream tests will fail in those and I don't see an automatic way to test
> > a random package in this way.
>
> Even if not minimal, at least corresp
> Those will correspond to build dependencies in a typical simple case, as
> the upstream tests need all those optional deps, assuming you mean the
> tests dependencies (and not the runtime dependencies which should already
> be in Depends).
Yes the runtime dependencies should be listed in the pyt
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 01:30:57PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Maybe we should install only the python binaries and the dependencies
> > marked .
>
> In a typical simple case all B-Ds except sphinx stuff will be
> as you don't need anything beyond the build system to "build" a pure
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
