Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-07 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Op Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:52:21AM + schreef Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی: > Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any rules? See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bugs.debian.org/978149 . Bye, Joost -- Joost van Baal-Ilić http://abramowitz.uvt.nl/

Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Joost (2023.02.07_11:31:23_+) > Op Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:52:21AM + schreef Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی: > > Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any > > rules? > > See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bugs.debian.org/978149 . I think the Python development communi

Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:31:23PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: > Op Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:52:21AM + schreef Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی: > > Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any > > rules? > > See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bugs.debian.org/978149 . Oh, ho

Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-07 Thread karthek
Sorry for spamming… Resending the same message, I just remembered debian.org ignores mails from mail@* addresses. On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:24:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote: > > See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bugs.debian.org/978149 . > > I think the Python development community would be very happy