Hi,
while working further on doing packaging on NetBox I've started trying
to package more upcoming new dependencies.
Namely I was looking into mkdocstrings [1], which is a new dep for the
next minor version of NetBox (in order to build the documentation).
mkdocstrings comes (of course) wit
Hi Carsten,
> Or is there a way to get such packages build without a need for PDM to be
> around?
This should really not matter at all when packaging for Debian. The source
tarball should include a setup.cfg or setup.py file (i.e. be a regular Python
sdist), and if not developing on the packag
Hi Nick,
Am 03.04.22 um 09:58 schrieb Dominik George:
Hi Carsten,
Or is there a way to get such packages build without a need for PDM to be
around?
This should really not matter at all when packaging for Debian. The
source tarball should include a setup.cfg or setup.py file (i.e. be a
regul
Hi,
> I've compared the tarball from GH with the file from PyPi, the sdist on PyPi
> contains even less files than the GH tarball, but also no setup.* files.
Uh, PEP-517 actually allows that... I have never seen that in the wild.
Cool, so this really means we will ultimately have to package ev
Hi Dominik (2022.04.03_09:16:14_+)
> > I've compared the tarball from GH with the file from PyPi, the sdist on
> > PyPi contains even less files than the GH tarball, but also no setup.*
> > files.
>
> Uh, PEP-517 actually allows that... I have never seen that in the wild.
It's becoming quit
5 matches
Mail list logo
