Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

2021-11-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On November 27, 2021 6:01:08 AM UTC, Sandro Tosi wrote: >Hello, >while working on something else[1], i noticed how many of the >repositories in the DPT salsa group are in poor shape: > >* missing branches >* changes not pushed to salsa >* general misalignment in configuration/setup/organization

xcffib update for qtile packaging

2021-11-27 Thread Jérôme
Hello, In the absence of a reply, I have worked on xcffib package to update it to the last upstream release as well as Debian standards. I intend to adopt it[1] but I am looking for a sponsor - or moving this package to DPT? - in order to upload it. Does anybody here have time for that please

Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

2021-11-27 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 09:38:41 +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I don't think the pypi tarball "issue" should be presumed to be a > problem at all. I wasn't paying attention to Debian when that discussion > happened, but in my experience there was a lot wrong with the idea. > A properly constructe

Re: xcffib update for qtile packaging

2021-11-27 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Jérôme, On 11/27/21 3:44 PM, Jérôme wrote: Hello, In the absence of a reply, I have worked on xcffib package to update it to the last upstream release as well as Debian standards. I intend to adopt it[1] but I am looking for a sponsor - or moving this package to DPT? - in order to upload

Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

2021-11-27 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Sandro (2021.11.27_06:01:08_+) > Hello, > while working on something else[1], i noticed how many of the > repositories in the DPT salsa group are in poor shape: > > * missing branches > * changes not pushed to salsa > * general misalignment in configuration/setup/organization > * many othe

Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report

2021-11-27 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2021-11-27 08 h 54, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Sandro (2021.11.27_06:01:08_+) > >> Hello, >> while working on something else[1], i noticed how many of the >> repositories in the DPT salsa group are in poor shape: >> >> * missing branches >> * changes not pushed to salsa >> * general misalig

Re: Fwd: grammalecte_2.1.2+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2021-11-27 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2021-11-08 14 h 00, Romain Porte wrote: > Hello, > > 06/11/2021 18:18, Louis-Philippe Véronneau : >> Hello! >> >> Grammalecte was rejected. It would be nice if you could fix the issue >> mentioned below :) > > Please have a look at https://mentors.debian.net/package/grammalecte/ > > DSC file: