Hi all,
before doing something nasty I would like to hear if
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg2.html
is still valid?
Thanks for your feedback,
Mathias
--
Mathias Behrle
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1
* Mathias Behrle: " PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state" (Mon, 25
Oct 2021 19:45:39 +0200):
> Hi all,
>
> before doing something nasty I would like to hear if
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg2.html
> is still valid?
JFTR I forgot to mention the background o
Hi Thomas and all!
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm referenced for 55 packages. Please don't force me to do this right
> away, that's too much work. I very much would prefer if we could have a
> smoother transition.
>
> Note that it's possible that for
On 2021-10-25 14 h 04, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Mathias Behrle: " PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state" (Mon, 25
> Oct 2021 19:45:39 +0200):
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> before doing something nasty I would like to hear if
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/06/msg2.html
>> is
On 10/25/21 8:18 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> However, it would be still nice to remove nose at some future point, maybe
> before Bookworm release.
Will do, probably for the next version of OpenStack (last one made me
update 220 packages: that's a good way to review everything).
> I'm impressed b
* Louis-Philippe Véronneau: " Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current
state" (Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:28:17 -0400):
> On 2021-10-25 14 h 04, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > * Mathias Behrle: " PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian: current state" (Mon,
> > 25 Oct 2021 19:45:39 +0200):
> >
> >> Hi al
6 matches
Mail list logo
