Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-09 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs >> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed >> for >> all known problems [1], and the current

Bug#974035: ITP: jupyterlab-server -- base component to create JupyterLab applications

2020-11-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: jupyterlab-server Version: 1.2.0 Upstream author: Project Jupyter contributors * URL: https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab_server * License: BSD-3-clause and Expat Programming lang: Python Des

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/9/20 10:19 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/973239 src:python-fixtures Does anyone else than me think it's probably OK to just disable to 2 broken tests? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-11-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 11/9/20 6:34 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/9/20 10:19 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> https://bugs.debian.org/973239 src:python-fixtures > > Does anyone else than me think it's probably OK to just disable to 2 > broken tests? As long as it doesn't indicate something serious, it's pr