On 10/30/20 3:18 PM, Fioddor Superconcentrado wrote:
> As I said I'm very new to this and all (python) packages I'm using
> lately use the usual python tools (pipy, setup.py, etc) and my first
> approach has been to stick as close as possible to the upstream
> procedures. But I might very likely be
On 2020-10-31 12:03:50 +0100 (+0100), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> On 10/31/20 3:07 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > I have to agree, though in the upstream projects with which I'm
> > involved, those generated files are basically a lossy re-encoding of
> > metadata from the Git repositories themselv
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 12:03:50PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Pypi is often thought as a Python module source repository. It is *NOT*.
> It is a repository for binaries to be consumed by pip.
Oooh, that's a very interesting thought I never considered.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description:
On 2020-10-31 19:48:29 +0500 (+0500), Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 12:03:50PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Pypi is often thought as a Python module source repository. It
> > is *NOT*. It is a repository for binaries to be consumed by pip.
>
> Oooh, that's a very interest
4 matches
Mail list logo
