help with FTBFS bug due to python3.8/3.9 confusion

2020-10-26 Thread Stephen Sinclair
Hello Debian Python members, I am looking into a bug in a Debian Science package that I maintain and need some information. It is a C++ library with a complicated CMake setup that also produces a Python binding via swig. Recently a FTBFS bug was filed against the package because apparently it do

python-team/packages repo move request

2020-10-26 Thread Gordon Ball
Hello Julien sent a request to move/archive the redundant ipython repo about two weeks ago, but it looks like it got missed by anyone with admin. Could someone with powers: 1. Archive python-team/packages/ipython 2. Rename python-team/packages/ipython4 -> python-team/packages/ipython The split

Re: help with FTBFS bug due to python3.8/3.9 confusion

2020-10-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:54:37AM +0100, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > The recommendations are to change the build-dep on "python-dev" to > "python-all-dev", and I can confirm that this does allow the package > to build. (Is this the right thing to do?) Building a module for all supported Python vers

Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye

2020-10-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs > are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed > for > all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can be seen > at > [2