On 4/30/20 5:28 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think Python policy changes should be discussed. I accidentally committed
> a
> change to git [1] (I didn't realize I still had access, I thought it would be
> a merge request) to allow Python 3 only wheels for packages that require
> wheels, but
On April 30, 2020 7:21:39 AM UTC, Matthias Klose wrote:
>On 4/30/20 5:28 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I think Python policy changes should be discussed. I accidentally
>committed a
>> change to git [1] (I didn't realize I still had access, I thought it
>would be
>> a merge request) to allow
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "r4d"
* Package name: r4d
Version : 1.5-1
Upstream Author : Benedikt Spranger
* URL : https://github.com/ci-rt/r4d
* License : GPL-3+
* Vcs
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:53:33 AM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On April 30, 2020 7:21:39 AM UTC, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >On 4/30/20 5:28 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> I think Python policy changes should be discussed. I accidentally
> >committed a
> >> change to git [1] (I didn't realize
Hi Scott (2020.04.30_16:23:41_+)
> Making dirtbike build a py3 wheel for setuptools (and pkg_resources), which
> is
> technically accurate at this point since dirtbike can't build wheels from a
> python2 package was trivial to do:
>
> dirtbike/__init__.py | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 in
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 2:32:24 PM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Scott (2020.04.30_16:23:41_+)
>
> > Making dirtbike build a py3 wheel for setuptools (and pkg_resources),
> > which is technically accurate at this point since dirtbike can't build
> > wheels from a>
> > python2 package was
I would like to join the DPMT, there are a couple of reasons for this.
Firstly I have been making an effort to try and get broken build-dependencies
in testing fixed, and this often ends up involving python module packages. It
would be easier to fix such packages as a member of the team than wo
Hi Scott (2020.04.30_20:33:59_+)
> > That seems reasonable, although if we're going down that road, it
> > probably makes no sense for any of them to be universal.
>
> If we were talking about maintaining this for multiple release cycles with
> lots of version divergence, I would agree. Let'
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 5:49:20 PM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Scott (2020.04.30_20:33:59_+)
>
> > > That seems reasonable, although if we're going down that road, it
> > > probably makes no sense for any of them to be universal.
> >
> > If we were talking about maintaining this for mu
9 matches
Mail list logo
