Hi,
čt 28. 11. 2019 v 4:12 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal:
> i'm not sure we can: in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/10/msg00096.html you say
> "We need to prepare draft of RC-bumper email", is this draft ready?
>
ah, you are right.
> add the description to the header (as comment
Package: python-sponge
Severity: serious
x-debbugs-cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
While looking at some python2 removal issues, I came across python sponge. I
noticed the following about the package.
* Python 2 only.
* Only one maintainer upload (and one NMU) ever.
* Not in stable or testin
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:46:34PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: python-pypubsub
> Version: 4.0.3-2
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: regression
>
> ...
>
> [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-pypubsub
>
> https://c
Hi,
čt 28. 11. 2019 v 16:04 odesílatel Andreas Tille napsal:
> Is there any trick to enable autopkgtest-pkg-python detecting the correct
> module name?
>
no (not yet? See: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autodep8/merge_requests/6
)
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: python-ibm-cloud-sdk-core
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Erika Dsouza
* URL : https://github.com/IBM/python-sdk-core/
* License : Apa
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:18:07PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote:
>
> > Is there any trick to enable autopkgtest-pkg-python detecting the correct
> > module name?
> >
>
> no (not yet? See: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autodep8/merge_requests/6
> )
Hmmm, what are the chances to get this applied?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:11 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:18:07PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any trick to enable autopkgtest-pkg-python detecting the correct
> > > module name?
> > >
> >
> > no (not yet? See: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autodep8/me
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:15:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Hmmm, what are the chances to get this applied? I've added
> >
> >X-Python-Module-Name: pubsub
> >
> > in Git - but this will not reall fix the test. The only solution I'd see
> > otherwise is to deactivate the test.
>
> if you
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 11:15:31 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> if you install `pubsub` as top-level module, your package must be
> named pythonN-pubsub, if not it violates the policy and it's RC buggy.
That's what I had thought, but I've also seen people asserting that the
Debian package name ought t
Hi,
čt 28. 11. 2019 v 17:11 odesílatel Andreas Tille napsal:
> Hmmm, what are the chances to get this applied? I've added
>
tbh dunno :)
> in Git - but this will not reall fix the test. The only solution I'd see
> otherwise is to deactivate the test.
>
you have two options:
1. deactivate t
> I think we should use something simple/short like this:
>
> --cut--
> Raising severity of Python 2 removal bugs, for details see:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/11/msg0.html
> --cut--
this is live now, with the following header:
# Part of the effort for the removal o
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal
The only release was in 2005. https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0754/
was abouyt including it into stdlib and it failed.
The only revdep, jack-mixer, was recently removed from the archive.
Popcon
Hi,
čt 28. 11. 2019 v 19:07 odesílatel Sandro Tosi napsal:
> this is live now, with the following header:
>
cool, thanks again!
--
Best regards
Ondřej Nový
On November 28, 2019 5:27:53 PM UTC, Simon McVittie wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 11:15:31 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> if you install `pubsub` as top-level module, your package must be
>> named pythonN-pubsub, if not it violates the policy and it's RC
>buggy.
>
>That's what I had thought, but
> On Nov 29, 2019, at 01:28, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> Is there consensus that the top-level module name is what matters, and not
> following the recommendation is a bug?
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/module_packages.html
> says "The binary package for module foo s
Hi,
I'd like to help maintain the python-neovim package, as part of my
general maintenance of the (neo)vim ecosystem.
I've read the DPMT policy and agree to it.
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
