On 11/12/19 2:38 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> please also realize not everyone shares the
> same ideas as yours and you should try sometimes to respect those
> people decisions too.
With all due respect, the point that I'm trying to make is that this
policy is only there because what I believe is a mi
matplotlib2 seems to be an important node in the python2 removal/reduction
problem (and the qt4 removal problem). I have noticed there are a substantial
number of python module packages that it build-depends on but does not depend
on.
python-backports.functools-lru-cache
python-cairocffi
pytho
Hi,
It seems I need to discuss here before adding followings.
| Package: src:getmail
| Version: 5.13-1
| Severity: normal
| Tags: sid bullseye
| User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: py2keep
Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in
it ... (Not just 2.7).
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:37:27AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in
> it ... (Not just 2.7). I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg even
> made some effort to support both 2 and 3 but the idea was rejected by
> upstream in 2018. (Then we both lost
Hi all,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:13:51PM +, peter green wrote:
> matplotlib2 seems to be an important node in the python2 removal/reduction
> problem (and the qt4 removal problem). I have noticed there are a
> substantial number of python module packages that it build-depends on but
> does n
By itself, removing those dependencies reduces the big tangle [0] from
148 packages to 141, the freed ones being: ipywidgets pyqt5 pep8
autopep8 xcffib xlwt cairocffi. (Note that "not in a tangle" means "no
*circular* dependencies", *not* "leaf / can be removed immediately".)
There may also b
On 07.11.19 15:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This weekend, I am planning to upload python3-defaults, adding python3.8 as a
> supported Python3 version. This may introduce some churn in unstable until
> the
> basic binNMUs are available as well.
>
> Details for the addition can be found at [1], kno
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:24 AM peter green wrote:
> I am guessing that many of these are to get testsuite coverage for optional
> features and are not strictly needed for the build, while testing stuff is
> nice I don't think it's vital for software that is on it's way out. I tried
> removing
8 matches
Mail list logo
