Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change) [phase 1 DONE]

Hi, st 15. 8. 2018 v 4:12 odesílatel Lars Kruse napsal: > > What's up with the page? https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ > > thankfully it was merged by Ondrej into > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging. > yes I merged it "back" to original page. If you know how to redirect Gi

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change) [phase 1 DONE]

Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 08:43:28+0200, Ondrej Novy a écrit : > Hi, > > st 15. 8. 2018 v 4:12 odesílatel Lars Kruse napsal: > > > What's up with the page? https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ > > thankfully it was merged by Ondrej into > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Git

Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

Hi, I was asked a long time ago to make a pypy package for nose2[1]. I realized while considering this bug that I'd require to have a pypy package for mock first. mock build-depends on unittest2 and pbr that are not pypy-packaged either. pbr is maintained in the OpenStack Team, but zigo is eager

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with so that one can easily (re)bootstrap the circle at any time by using DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck dpkg-buildpa

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change) [phase 1 DONE]

Hi Pierre-Elliott, st 15. 8. 2018 v 12:50 odesílatel Pierre-Elliott Bécue napsal: > It's done, now. :) > thanks a lot. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, 12:11 Samuel Thibault, wrote: > Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? > > Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with > so that one can easily (re)bootstrap the circ

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 13:10:39+0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? > > Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with > so that one can easily (re)bo

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 15:11:25+0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit : > Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 13:10:39+0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit: > > > 2. What's the proper way to handle such packages? > > > > Build profiles? Yo

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

Hello, Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 15:47:36 +0200, a ecrit: > So I found a way to build locally, using your suggestions. In my case I > guess I could upload directly the output of the nocheck build as the bin > package isn't altered. Yes, but better request a binnmu after the uploa