On 05/21/2018 01:38 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> You probably didn't notice that this is already happening (mentioned in the
> thread).
Great!
> There are other parts of the proposal that we are less sanguine about that
> you conveniently removed. It is probably a better idea to get your facts
Hi Ghislain,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:39:00AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Le lun. 9 avr. 2018 à 08:46, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > I realised that upstream of tifffile[1] switched to Python3. When
> > inspecting the package I somehow think that its main purpose is rather a
> > user ap
On 05/17/2018 08:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
>
> The most important change from my point of view is
>
> -* It is suggested that even distribution-specific packages follow the
> - ``python2``/``python3`` convention, even in code th
On 05/20/2018 11:49 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 08:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
>>
>> The most important change from my point of view is
>>
>> -* It is suggested that even distribution-specific packages follow the
>> -
On May 22, 2018 7:24:12 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 05/20/2018 11:49 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 05/17/2018 08:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
>>>
>>> The most important change from my point of view is
>>>
>>> -* It is sug
5 matches
Mail list logo
