Hi Antoine,
Thanks for your post.
On 09/27/2017 12:29 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> 6. there are currently packages depending on *both* python-sphinx and
> python3-sphinx. for me, that makes no sense at all: there is a
> single set of documentation files built in a package, and it must be
Hello guyes.
> override_dh_sphinxdoc:
> ifeq (,$(findstring nodocs, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
nodocs or nodoc
I alsa do something like this when there is extensions.
override_dh_sphinxdoc:
ifeq (,$(findstring nodoc, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
PYBUILD_SYSTEM=
On 29/09/17 12:08, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
override_dh_sphinxdoc:
ifeq (,$(findstring nodocs, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
nodocs or nodoc
I alsa do something like this when there is extensions.
override_dh_sphinxdoc:
ifeq (,$(findstring nodoc, $(DEB_BUIL
Or just use the sphinx-generated Makefile if there is one:
Except that when there is an autodoc in the documentation, I like to build the
doc with all {interpreters}.
It is a sort of unit test
Cheers
Fred
statsmodels passed NEW...and FTBFS with
dh: unable to load addon sphinxdoc: Can't locate
Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm in @INC
That file is in the sphinx-common package, which suggests that at least
some of the sphinx dependencies need to be Build-Depends and not just
Build-Depends-
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 22:05 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> statsmodels passed NEW...and FTBFS with
>
> dh: unable to load addon sphinxdoc: Can't locate
> Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/sphinxdoc.pm in @INC
> That file is in the sphinx-common package, which suggests that at
> least
> some of the sp
6 matches
Mail list logo
