Interest in packaging python-dotenv?

2017-06-20 Thread Bastian Venthur
Dear Python-modules team, is anyone interested (or already working on) packaging python-dotenv? From all *dotenv packages it is currently the most famous one for python. It allows for using .env files in python and provides a command line tool: https://github.com/theskumar/python-dotenv

Re: Ad-hoc Debian Python BoF at PyCon US 2017

2017-06-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10.06.2017 05:32, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jun 06, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> if we plan (and it looks like we do) to support and distribute 2.7 >> with buster, why not support it *properly*? what's the point of >> deprecating python2.7? either we ship it or not, but if we do th

Re: python3 statsmodels?

2017-06-20 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team (https://tracker.debi

Re: python3 statsmodels?

2017-06-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi > wrote: > > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library > statsmodels is ma

Re: Ad-hoc Debian Python BoF at PyCon US 2017

2017-06-20 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-20 16:40:26 +0200 (+0200), Matthias Klose wrote: [...] > another one many openstack packages. [...] Spot checking the source packages in the archive currently, it looks like Thomas already has most of these done. By way of background there, a coordinated effort has been underway for th