Re: Re: Moving off of git-dpm (Re: git-dpm breakage src:faker)

2017-02-07 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
I know the discussion is leaning towards replacing usage of git-dpm with gbp-pq. I have nothing against it but, since we are talking about solutions for a git-centric workflow, has anyone considered the dgit- maint-merge workflow [1]? It is very well documented and would simplify team-packaging po

Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with exposed calling script

2017-02-07 Thread Thomas Nyberg
Hi Simon, Thank you very much for the response! I've been looking at the offlineimap package on my system (jessie), but in my case `/usr/bin/offlineimap` is _not_ a symlink. Also the python code is not installed to `/usr/share/offlineimap` and instead to `/usr/share/pyshared/offlineimap/` and

Re: Re: Moving off of git-dpm (Re: git-dpm breakage src:faker)

2017-02-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 at 10:47:00 +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I know the discussion is leaning towards replacing usage of git-dpm > with gbp-pq. I have nothing against it but, since we are talking about > solutions for a git-centric workflow, has anyone considered the dgit- > maint-merge workfl

Re: Moving off of git-dpm (Re: git-dpm breakage src:faker)

2017-02-07 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 07, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >I know the discussion is leaning towards replacing usage of git-dpm >with gbp-pq. I have nothing against it but, since we are talking about >solutions for a git-centric workflow, has anyone considered the dgit- >maint-merge workflow [1]? As

Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with exposed calling script

2017-02-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:50:02AM -0500, Thomas Nyberg wrote: > I've been looking at the offlineimap package on my system (jessie), but in > my case `/usr/bin/offlineimap` is _not_ a symlink. Also the python code is > not installed to `/usr/share/offlineimap` and instead to > `/usr/share/pyshared/

Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with exposed calling script

2017-02-07 Thread Thomas Nyberg
On 02/07/2017 08:54 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:50:02AM -0500, Thomas Nyberg wrote: You should look at the sid package version, it's different there. Thanks a lot! (Should have been an obvious first step...) And thanks a lot everyone else! Also I figure I might a

Re: Re: Moving off of git-dpm (Re: git-dpm breakage src:faker)

2017-02-07 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:47:00AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I know the discussion is leaning towards replacing usage of git-dpm > with gbp-pq. I have nothing against it but, since we are talking about > solutions for a git-centric workflow, has anyone considered the dgit- > maint-merge wor