Re: Plan for ipython 5 transition

2016-10-11 Thread Tobias Hansen
Hi, ok, but are you ok with us moving ahead? Is ipython generally ready to migrate? What about the other related packages (ipykernel, jupyter_client, jupyter_core, nbconvert, nbformat). Should they all migrate together? Are they ready (up to questions of transition)? I did another attempt to buil

Re: python debug packages

2016-10-11 Thread Ben Finney
Iustin Pop writes: > Reading > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide#Building_python_-dbg_packages, > there is some hints to this The introduction of ‘foo-dbgsym’ automatic generated packages makes me quite sure those instructions are obsolete. But perhaps they are not? > but it's no

Re: python debug packages

2016-10-11 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 11 octobre 2016 10:38 CEST, Ben Finney  : >> Reading >> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide#Building_python_-dbg_packages, >> there is some hints to this > > The introduction of ‘foo-dbgsym’ automatic generated packages makes me > quite sure those instructions are obsolete. But per

Re: python debug packages

2016-10-11 Thread Ben Finney
Vincent Bernat writes: > The page seems up-to-date It makes no reference to why ‘foo-dbgsym’ is not enough, so the reader doesn't have any guidance on which practice overrules the other. > and already explains why Python is different (presence of a debug > interpreter) As I said, that doesn't

Re: Plan for ipython 5 transition

2016-10-11 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, On 11/10/2016 09:27, Tobias Hansen wrote: ok, but are you ok with us moving ahead? Is ipython generally ready to migrate? What about the other related packages (ipykernel, jupyter_client, jupyter_core, nbconvert, nbformat). Should they all migrate together? Are they ready (up to questions of