Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm orphaning python-application as I don't use it anymore
and also I don't see a reason to keep it as there are
better solutions these days.
If nobody wants to keep it in Debian AND wants to maintain it,
I'll ask for removal before the release of stretch.
Bes
Hello Forum,
Some code in an ipynb document have to be discarded because
it causes a privacy-breach-logo lintian error. Bring the involved
icon in the debian folder makes no senses because the code is meant
to be a URL example. Currently, I literally discard the involved code,
neverthless I would
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Sponsors,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package nbsphinx [0,1].
This package brings nbsphinx to Debian on behalf of the Debian
Python Modules Team. This is my second Debian Python Module package,
s
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Some code in an ipynb document have to be discarded because
> it causes a privacy-breach-logo lintian error. Bring the involved
> icon in the debian folder makes no senses because the code is meant
> to be a URL example. Currently, I literal
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Jupyter Notebook: how to comment out code in ipynb files ?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 03:43:28 +0100
From: Jerome BENOIT
Reply-To: sphericaltrian...@rezozer.net
Organisation: Round Sphere
To: Paul Wise
On 26/09/16 02:18, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon
On 26/09/16 04:05, Paul Wise wrote:
> Any particular reason you moved this thread off-list?
mistake
>
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 03:43 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> I am dealing with the nbsphinx package [0,1].
>>
>> The patch d/p/debianization-neutralize-lintian-privacy-breach-logo.patch in
On 26/09/16 04:47, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
> On 26/09/16 04:05, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Any particular reason you moved this thread off-list?
>
> mistake
>
>>
>> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 03:43 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>
>>> I am dealing with the nbsphinx package [0,1].
>>>
>>> The patch d/p/deb
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Now, I am not so sure: in case it is a false positive
Can you upload source and binary packages somewhere so we can
determine the right answer?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On 26/09/16 05:37, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> Now, I am not so sure: in case it is a false positive
>
> Can you upload source and binary packages somewhere so we can
> determine the right answer?
I put them a few hours ago at the Debian Sage
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I put them a few hours ago at the Debian Sage Tean [1] repository at Aliot
> [2].
Looks like these are not false positives and are definitely privacy
breaches (probably minor since I'm not sure anyone would read the
docs) and there is one
10 matches
Mail list logo
