Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On 09/10/2016 05:34 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > The "[Python-modules-team]" thing in the subject is probably enough to > break the DKIM signature. I don't believe DKIM signature is done on the header+body. If I'm not mistaking, it's done only in the body of the mail, because each SMTP server on the

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

Yes, you are mistaken :-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail#How_it_works Thanks.

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

❦ 23 septembre 2016 16:15 CEST, Thomas Goirand  : >> The "[Python-modules-team]" thing in the subject is probably enough to >> break the DKIM signature. > > I don't believe DKIM signature is done on the header+body. If I'm not > mistaking, it's done only in the body of the mail, because each SMTP

Bug#838679: RFS: cysignals/1.1.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- interrupt and signal handling for Cython

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Sponsor, I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package cysignals [0]. This package brings cysignals to Debian on behalf of the Debian Python Modules Team. This is my very first Debian Python Module package

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

On Friday, September 23, 2016 04:15:23 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/10/2016 05:34 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > > The "[Python-modules-team]" thing in the subject is probably enough to > > break the DKIM signature. > > I don't believe DKIM signature is done on the header+body. If I'm not > mistak

Fwd: Bug#838679: RFS: cysignals/1.1.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- interrupt and signal handling for Cython

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#838679: RFS: cysignals/1.1.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- interrupt and signal handling for Cython Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:54:01 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debi