On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM,
wrote:
> Your membership in the mailing list Python-modules-team has been
> disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you
> was dated 10-Sep-2016. You will not get any more messages from this
> list until you re-enable your membership. You w
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 02:46:54PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM,
> wrote:
> > Your membership in the mailing list Python-modules-team has been
> > disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you
> > was dated 10-Sep-2016. You will not get any mor
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 02:46:54PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:19 PM,
>> wrote:
>> > Your membership in the mailing list Python-modules-team has been
>> > disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:15:19PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > AFAIK, Gmail does not bounce spam. It rejects messages with broken
> > DKIM signatures.
>
> no. it rejects (yes technically not bounce, the mails are rejected in
> the smtp se
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:15:19PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Fine, but it is yet to be seen that the quoted message is rejected for
> being "spam" (which is not an exact sci
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> The correct behaviour if they really want to avoid spam to even reach
> the spam folder, is to accept the email, and discard it.
err that's wrong, so wrong. every email provider with a handful of
users rejects spam messages in the smtp sess
On Sep 10, 2016, at 02:46 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>I'm sure i'm not the only member using gmail, which bounces spam
>emails and that what causes this problem.
Are you sure about that? Bouncing spam has been bad practice for a very long
time.
Cheers,
-Barry
On Sep 10, 2016, at 04:32 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
>AFAIK, Gmail does not bounce spam. It rejects messages with broken
>DKIM signatures.
There are a number of DKIM mitigation features in newer versions of Mailman 2
that should be investigated. I can't tell what version of Mailman this list
is us
On 2016-09-10 17:29, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> in some countries (italy to name one) you would be
> breaking the law accepting emails and not delivering them to the
> recipient.
Same in Germany, AFAIK.
Yeah, I get these (quite annoying) bounce warnings on my gmail account once
in a while. It's quite annoying.
Paul
On Sep 10, 2016 2:35 PM, "Barry Warsaw" wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2016, at 02:46 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> >I'm sure i'm not the only member using gmail, which bounces spam
> >emails
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2016, at 02:46 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>>I'm sure i'm not the only member using gmail, which bounces spam
>>emails and that what causes this problem.
>
> Are you sure about that? Bouncing spam has been bad practice for a very long
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Sep 10, 2016, at 02:46 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>
>>>I'm sure i'm not the only member using gmail, which bounces spam
>>>emails and that what causes this problem.
>>
>> Are you sure about
12 matches
Mail list logo
