Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 12:30:42AM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > * libraries in Stretch should support 2.X (i.e. add python-foo binary > packages) if that doesn't require too much additional work (py2dsp > still creates them). I'm OK with shipping 3.X only packages in NEW > packages, though

Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

FWIW, On Aug 21, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >* all Python applications that support it, should use 3.X only *now* > (and do not bother with things like alternatives or "-3" suffixes / > "python3-" prefixes - at least for new packages; I'd even slowly start > removing alternative