Python module packaging

2015-08-19 Thread olivier sallou
Hi, I'd like to "simple" package python-eta module[0]. Having a look at policy, I only see SVN repo [1]. Can't we package module using a git repo ? Thanks Olivier [0] https://github.com/mbreese/eta/ [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam

Re: Removing some python3-* packages

2015-08-19 Thread Matthias Klose
On 07/09/2015 12:25 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 3 July 2015 at 08:29, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> I think dropping these duplicates is the only thing that makes sense. For >> reference, I dropped python3-ipaddr once python3.2 was gone (because 3.3 has >> ipaddress, which does the same thing).

Re: Python module packaging

2015-08-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 19, 2015, at 04:11 PM, olivier sallou wrote: >I'd like to "simple" package python-eta module[0]. Having a look at policy, >I only see SVN repo [1]. Can't we package module using a git repo ? We are very close to switching to git. I'm hoping it might actually happen during Debconf, or soo

Re: Python module packaging

2015-08-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 19, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >On Aug 19, 2015, at 04:11 PM, olivier sallou wrote: > >>I'd like to "simple" package python-eta module[0]. Having a look at policy, >>I only see SVN repo [1]. Can't we package module using a git repo ? > >We are very close to switching to git. I

Re: Python module packaging

2015-08-19 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
On 08/19/2015 06:44 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 19, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> On Aug 19, 2015, at 04:11 PM, olivier sallou wrote: >> >>> I'd like to "simple" package python-eta module[0]. Having a look at policy, >>> I only see SVN repo [1]. Can't we package module using a

Re: Python module packaging

2015-08-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 19, 2015, at 07:41 PM, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: >As I am not a regular contributor to the python-modules (only made a few), >would you want to review the package once in git (when ready) before I upload >? Or should I go when ready ? after reading again Python Policy of course >;-

mass-bug filling proposal: missing dh-python build dependency

2015-08-19 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
Hi, I checked¹ logs from gcc rebuild² and it looks like almost 500 packages are still missing dh-python build dependency even thought the warning is there since a while. (and I'd really love to remove old dh_python2 from python package) Does someone want to prepare a patch for lintian to detect i