Re: wheel support for Debian?

2014-05-16 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
If I provide a script that generates .whl file out of Debian binary package, would that make more sense than these -wheels packages? python3.X-venv could simply depend on required packages and run this script (with a list of required dependencies) when someone creates new venv. You can also pre-ge

Re: RFS: confiture/2.0-1

2014-05-16 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Antoine Millet wrote: > On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 22:16 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> Hi Antoine, > > Hi Vincent, > >> I've cc-ed you in case you aren't subscribed to the list. Let me know >> if you are so I can drop it. > > I already subscribed to the list, so you c

Re: wheel support for Debian?

2014-05-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
Hi Piotr, On May 16, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >If I provide a script that generates .whl file out of Debian binary >package, would that make more sense than these -wheels packages? > >python3.X-venv could simply depend on required packages and run this >script (with a list of req

Re: wheel support for Debian?

2014-05-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 15, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >Shouldn't it be singular? Each package provides a wheel, not several wheels >(and I'd name the location the same for consistency). I thought about this. True, in all current cases there's a single wheel file in the binary package. I wanted

Proposed policy change to define but discourage Python wheels in Debian

2014-05-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
Here is the diff I propose to Debian Python policy, describing our policy on packaging wheels. Cheers, -Barry === modified file 'debian/python-policy.sgml' --- debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-12 10:21:25 + +++ debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-16 15:23:30 + @@ -32,7 +32,11 @@

Re: Proposed policy change to define but discourage Python wheels in Debian

2014-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 16, 2014 11:28:45 Barry Warsaw wrote: > Here is the diff I propose to Debian Python policy, describing our policy on > packaging wheels. > > Cheers, > -Barry > > === modified file 'debian/python-policy.sgml' > --- debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-12 10:21:25 + > +++ debian/pyt

Re: Proposed policy change to define but discourage Python wheels in Debian

2014-05-16 Thread Julian Taylor
On 16.05.2014 17:53, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, May 16, 2014 11:28:45 Barry Warsaw wrote: >> Here is the diff I propose to Debian Python policy, describing our policy on >> packaging wheels. >> >> Cheers, >> -Barry >> >> === modified file 'debian/python-policy.sgml' >> --- debian/python-po

Re: Proposed policy change to define but discourage Python wheels in Debian

2014-05-16 Thread Barry Warsaw
Second draft. -Barry === modified file 'debian/python-policy.sgml' --- debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-12 10:21:25 + +++ debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-16 18:08:52 + @@ -32,7 +32,11 @@ Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com - version 0.9.5 + +

Re: Proposed policy change to define but discourage Python wheels in Debian

2014-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 16, 2014 14:09:26 Barry Warsaw wrote: > Second draft. > -Barry > > === modified file 'debian/python-policy.sgml' > --- debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-12 10:21:25 + > +++ debian/python-policy.sgml 2014-05-16 18:08:52 + > @@ -32,7 +32,11 @@ > Scott Kitterman >

Re: restarting services after security upgrades in pure-Python modules?

2014-05-16 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Wise , 2014-05-16, 14:17: Anyone know if it is possible to detect processes that are using old versions of pure-Python modules after security upgrades to them? needrestart(1) attempts to do that, but I doubt it works well: https://sources.debian.net/src/needrestart/0.9-1/perl/lib/NeedRes