Re: Multiple copies of timeoutsocket.py in Debian packages

2014-01-29 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Thanks for your responses. Jakub Wilk writes: > * Olivier Berger , 2014-01-28, 16:39: >>A quick search on http://codesearch.debian.net reports many hits for >>the timeoutsocket.py library. >> >>I think it would be better to have a distinct package, then (hence a >>RFP: #736935). >> >>Howe

Re: git (was: Making packaging Python modules fun again)

2014-01-29 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:11 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >About git: This needs clarification, e.g. will we settle on gbp? >Shall our branch be "master" (gpbs default) or "debian" (more >intuitive when one works with upstream)? Will we use the >pristine-tar branch or pristine tar files? Etc. That a

Re: Multiple copies of timeoutsocket.py in Debian packages

2014-01-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Olivier Berger , 2014-01-29, 10:25: Yeah, timeoutsocket.py looks like something that should have died a decade ago. In Python ≥ 2.3 you can set default timeout or a per-socket timeout without help of this library. planet-venus, python-feedvalidator and rawdog already use the proper Python i

Preparing for a major update of python-rdflib package

2014-01-29 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. I'm contacting you as maintainers of reverse dependencies of python-rdflib. Maybe some python folks (CC-ed) will be interested too if RDF echoes somehow to their ears ;-) I'm basing this email on my system's testing telling me : $ apt-rdepends -r python-rdflib Reading package lists... Done