On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The only suggestion I can make is that it's generally not that hard for new
> code to make it work for both python2.7 and python3.3.
I do not agree.
--
anatoly t.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:55 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> The only suggestion I can make is that it's generally not that hard for new
>> code to make it work for both python2.7 and python3.3.
>
> I do not agree.
I mean that generally
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:55 PM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Scott Kitterman
>> wrote:
>>> The only suggestion I can make is that it's generally not that hard for new
>>> code to make it work for b
i'm not an expert by any means but i fail to see how this is an issue?
-Everyone wrote scripts for python 2.x using /usr/bin/python
-With python3, scripts were written specifically for python3 using
/usr/bin/python3
When Debian eventually changes to python3 by default all the scripts will
be writ
Lachlan writes:
> i'm not an expert by any means but i fail to see how this is an issue?
In short: Debian is not the only Unix-like system where Python is
installed, and consistency across operating systems is valuable.
> -Everyone wrote scripts for python 2.x using /usr/bin/python
And eventua
On 15 September 2013 07:53, Ben Finney wrote:
> Lachlan writes:
> Not all of them, and the expectation is that more and more systems will
> assume “/usr/bin/python” is the current version of Python.
I haven't seen any evidence that anyone except Arch has any intention
to do that.
Jeremy
--
To
Scott, I booted up a CentOS 6.4 VM, and the symlink is there (runs
python2.6). I'd be interested to know if there are any other systems where
it's unavailable though.
- Kerrick
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> Kerrick Staley wrote:
> >What's not included in "some n
Kerrick Staley wrote:
>Scott, I booted up a CentOS 6.4 VM, and the symlink is there (runs
>python2.6). I'd be interested to know if there are any other systems
>where
>it's unavailable though.
OK. I think that convinces me it's widely enough spread we ought to fix this
for Wheezy. I'll take i
On Sunday, September 15, 2013 14:34:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Kerrick Staley wrote:
> >Scott, I booted up a CentOS 6.4 VM, and the symlink is there (runs
> >python2.6). I'd be interested to know if there are any other systems
> >where
> >it's unavailable though.
>
> OK. I think that convinces m
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 09:53:41PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Lachlan writes:
> > i'm not an expert by any means but i fail to see how this is an issue?
> In short: Debian is not the only Unix-like system where Python is
> installed, and consistency across operating systems is valuable.
Yes, it
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Lachlan wrote:
> i'm not an expert by any means but i fail to see how this is an issue?
>
> -Everyone wrote scripts for python 2.x using /usr/bin/python
> -With python3, scripts were written specifically for python3 using
> /usr/bin/python3
>
> When Debian eventual
11 matches
Mail list logo
