Source package name suggestion?

2013-08-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
I plan to file an ITP to package the 'q' library: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/q/2.4 'q' seems like a terrible source package name, so I'll probably pick 'python-q' as the spn. Obviously we'll have python-q and python3-q[*] binary packages. I just wanted to see if anybody has strong opinions ei

Re: Source package name suggestion?

2013-08-22 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 22 August 2013 16:25, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I plan to file an ITP to package the 'q' library: > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/q/2.4 > > 'q' seems like a terrible source package name, so I'll probably pick > 'python-q' as the spn. Obviously we'll have python-q and python3-q[*] binary > package

Re: Source package name suggestion?

2013-08-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 22, 2013, at 05:15 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >I bet it's unrelated to QQ (largest IM network in the world, unless >skype has caught up after merging MSN). It's just a cute little "quick" debug/logging package. Ka-ping gave a lightening talk on it at Pycon and it seemed like a brilliantl