python3.3 status

2013-05-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
python3-defaults maintainer(s?) decided to make python3.3 a supported version without prior notice. Yay. Now we have dozens of packages failing to build: boost1.49 FTBFS TODO boost1.50 FTBFS TODO cairosvg FTBFS, needs fixed py3cairo cracklib2 FTBFS #681749 cssutils FTBFS, needs rebuilt nosetest

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Thanks Jakub, FWIW: > cython produces broken code #681697 update WiP (for some reason did not build using python-dbg at all thus dh_install failed... will troubleshoot shortly) > nuitka FTBFS TODO I believe fixed upstream -- if not -- will be, i.e. nothing to worry for the team -- Yaroslav O

Re: Accepted python-defaults 2.7.3-5 (source all)

2013-05-07 Thread Sandro Tosi
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/05/msg5.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/05/msg00020.html debian-python doesn't deserve a similar communication (don't you dare thinking about coordination, it's out of question) because we're just a bunch of puppets waiting for o

RFS: bunch, kitchen, grapefruit, fabulous, stomper, txws, txzmq, moksha.common, moksha.hub

2013-05-07 Thread Simon Chopin
(or RFR, for Jakub :P) Hello, I'm looking for sponsors for all the packages above, all dependencies of fedmsg in a way or another. bunch, kitchen and grapefruit (I think) have all been already reviewed by Jakub Wilk, all the remarks being adressed TTBMK. From the ITPs: bunch: Dot-accessible Py

Re: Accepted python-defaults 2.7.3-5 (source all)

2013-05-07 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 7 May 2013 18:46, Sandro Tosi wrote: > debian-python doesn't deserve a similar communication (don't you dare > thinking about coordination, it's out of question) because we're just > a bunch of puppets waiting for orders by the ultimate master - well > done. > Selectively quoting the tech com

Upload of python-mock 1.0.1 to Debian unstable

2013-05-07 Thread Simon Chopin
Hi, I'd like to know if/when you plan to upload python-mock 1.0.1 in unstable (it sits at the moment in experimental). One of my packages, pytest, currently FTBFS in unstable due to the recent Python 3.3 changes and the new upstream version build-depends on python-mock >= 1.0.1, so I guess you'd

Re: python3.3 status

2013-05-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2013-05-07, 14:01: Now we have dozens of packages failing to build: I should have said that I initially tested only packages build-depending on python3-all(-dev). There are also these, that build-depended only on the default version: pyinotify #692385 python-pip #692384 (and p

Re: Upload of python-mock 1.0.1 to Debian unstable

2013-05-07 Thread Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-05-07 22:32, Simon Chopin wrote: > I'd like to know if/when you plan to upload python-mock 1.0.1 in > unstable (it sits at the moment in experimental). I'm preparing it right now in SVN. @Stefanor: Could you sponsor me again? Cheers, - --