On 20/03/12 23:16, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Forks that simply suffix "2" are a really poor idea.
Yes, this.
> * Is the python-mpd upstream unresponsive? It looks like Alexander
> will stop actively maintaining python-mpd soon, but he doesn't support
> the fork for a number of valid reasons that ha
Hi,
First, thank for the review Fernando :)
I did forget to mention I recently adopt python-mpd, #612909 [0].
I also have to clarify that I only post an ITP for python-mpd2.
This thread is only a request for *review* (not a RFS), I do not intend to ask
for a sponsored upload in the near future
Hi Simon,
Le 21/03/2012 13:13, Simon McVittie a écrit :
> On 20/03/12 23:16, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> If the fork is just python-mpd with a few patches (as he states in the
> upstream bug report), one option for moving forward is to review those
> patches, check that they are as correct as they can
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:57:34AM -0400, Scott Moser a écrit :
>
> The grub stuff is only in the ubuntu package, and arguably should be
> separate source from cloud-init entirely. Basically, it maintains
> /boot/grub/menu.lst without conflicting with grub-pc.
Hi Scott,
it is actually grub-lega
Dear Andrew,
we are currently discussing on the debian-python list about the packaging of
cloud-init in Debian, which would depend on your package, python-mocker.
I see that you have not adressed yet #625481 for a couple of monthes. If it is
by lack of time or interest in the package, would you
5 matches
Mail list logo
