> In python-sphinx 1.0.7+dfsg-1 I made a few important changes:
> 3) There is a new helper tool, dh_sphinxdoc, which helps with packaging
> Sphinx-generated documentation. More specifically:
> - it does a few sanity checks (e.g. for missing files that are
> needed for the JavaScript to work);
> -
* PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel ,
2011-08-08, 07:45:
If your package builds documentation using Sphinx, I highly recommend
you to stop creating jquery.js symlink with dh_link (or such) and use
dh_sphinxdoc instead. This is the only future-proof way to have
fully-functional, policy compliant package
> This is pretty weird place for documentation. dh_sphinxdoc by default
> looks only into subdirectories of /usr/share/doc/, but you can tell it
> to look somewhere else.
I tryed but then comes the problem presented in the previous mail
dh_sphinxdoc is executed before dh_python2.
Maybe we should
I'm just getting back from vacation, so I'm playing catch-up right now.
Thanks for sending this email.
On Aug 07, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>1) Test your packages. Don't assume that the helper you use does the right
>thing. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
One thing I've found
On Aug 07, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>* Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-08-07, 10:07:
>>>"reportbug python" reports that "python is a dependency package". >>I
>>>don't know what a dependency package is but "python" seems a >>classic
>>>binary package to me. Where should this bug repor
Hi,
could you add me to alioth (osallou-guest) so that I add a new package (this is
a dependency for an other package to come).
I filled an ITP for this module:
Bug#637109: Acknowledgement (ITP: pycaptcha -- collection of Python modules
implementing CAPTCHAs)
I already maintain other pack
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du lundi 08 août 2011, vers 16:22, Barry
Warsaw disait :
"reportbug python" reports that "python is a dependency
package". I don't know what a dependency package is but "python"
seems a classic binary package to me. Where should this bug
reporte
At DebConf11 in Banja Luka, we had a short discussion¹ about Python 3
support in Debian. Apparently everything is very good, nobody
complained², no feature request for dh_python3... so I talked a little
bit about PEP 3147, PEP 3149, new and shiny PEP 402 and about status of
py3multibuild GSoC proje
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-08-08, 23:50:
We discussed /usr/bin/python2 symlink issue shortly and we all agreed
that we don't want Debian to use it (should helpers change shebangs
back to /usr/bin/python? Should lintian warn about it?)
I'm surprised to see that lintian doesn't already emit
unusu
* Jakub Wilk , 2011-08-09, 01:08:
We discussed /usr/bin/python2 symlink issue shortly and we all agreed
that we don't want Debian to use it (should helpers change shebangs
back to /usr/bin/python? Should lintian warn about it?)
I'm surprised to see that lintian doesn't already emit
unusual-in
Hi!
Is this page up-to-date?
http://wiki.debian.org/Python/DbgBuilds
Does dh_python2 handle this part itself now?
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
Make input easy to proofread.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
pgpB8brVrfl7W.pgp
Description: PG
11 matches
Mail list logo
