Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-30 Thread Éric Araujo
Hi, > python-decoratortools - version-agnostic decorators support for Python I’m curious about the usefulness of this package. Special syntax for function decorators is built-in in Python 2.4+ and the class counterpart is available in 2.6+ and 3.x. Why would we need support for older versions t

Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Éric Araujo , 2011-05-30, 15:56: python-decoratortools - version-agnostic decorators support for Python I’m curious about the usefulness of this package. Special syntax for function decorators is built-in in Python 2.4+ and the class counterpart is available in 2.6+ and 3.x. Why would we n

Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-30 Thread Daniele Tricoli
Hello, On Monday 30 May 2011 16:40:36 Jakub Wilk wrote: > 1. (Quoting long description:) "It provides [...] support for > decorating arbitrary assignments, synchronized methods, and more." I > didn't check what "more" means, though. ;) More means: - signature matching - debug generated code - "m

Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-30 Thread Daniele Tricoli
On Monday 30 May 2011 19:41:20 Daniele Tricoli wrote: > In addiction after this change python-peak.rules, python-protocols and > python-turbogears have to be fixed. I can volunteer to manage this fixing work but python-protocols is not under the DPMT umbrella. What do you think? Cheers, --

Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Daniele Tricoli , 2011-05-30, 19:41: I discovered that decoratortools was orphaned working on #607083. My first thought was to include decoratortools in python-peak.util, but the former has a popcon score about twice the latter. In addiction after this change python-peak.rules, python-protoco