On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 21:19, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places,
>> but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well]
>>
>> I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Py
Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 15:21 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> That's overly pessimistic. I'm on the other end of extreme: Wheezy CAN
> release with Py3k as default version. There's a lot of porting efforts
> going on, and Debian would be heroic to be one of the long term
> releases (earl
Howdy all,
What relationship should be declared between a binary ‘python-foo-dbg’
package and the ‘python-dbg’ package?
My search-fu must be weak today. I remember a discussion somewhere
regarding Python extensions in C and the resulting ‘python-foo-dbg’
package.
I can't remember the rationale,
3 matches
Mail list logo
