Hi,
[discussion started at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2010/04/msg00046
should we continue or trim some of the cc'ed lists ?]
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:41:16PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2010, at 06:35 PM, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:52:11PM -0400,
Hi,
unfortunately, I've missed decision to remove Python2.4 from Debian,
but the result is that Zope2.10, required for Plone 3.x, will not run
on Squeeze anymore, and that the zope2.10 package from sid is now
completely uninstallable.
Even installing Zope from upstream's source, imho "the" recom
Il 27/04/2010 11.17, Toni Mueller ha scritto:
> I am not sure that this was a good choice, although I feel the pain of
> maintaining a Python 2.4 stack in Squeeze, because:
>
> * Plone, and thus Zope is still a major Python application, and I
>heavily doubt that Plone 4.0 will see the light i
* 2010-04-27 15:16, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> When dealing with python2.4 removal, we asked Fabio about state of the
> art of Zope 2.14 and Plone 4. He replied he hadn't way to look at them at
> that time, and he would have looked upgrading the whole stack in
> April/May. CCing him, to see if things
On Apr 27, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
>[discussion started at
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2010/04/msg00046
>should we continue or trim some of the cc'ed lists ?]
Is there a better place to discuss Python packaging issues that are of
interest to both Debian and Ubuntu? A
Hi,
On Tue, 27.04.2010 at 15:42:45 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella
wrote:
> The current stable release of Plone requires python2.4 and Zope2.10, which
> we cannot support in squeeze. I see no way to really support them, so I'd
> prefer to have the packages removed.
from my point of view, only Python
Hi,
I forgot to ask what'd be the best way to go forward for Plonistas?
I really think that there should be some time for Plonistas to upgrade,
which the current scheme does not allow for.
I see the following options:
* Compile everything from source, including Python 2.4
So far, Debian's P
On Apr 27, 2010, at 06:32 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>I'm not sure about how much the changes in the infrastructure would be
>an obstacle, or prevent this from happening (didn't check yet), and I
>don'tknow how the group thinks about the political and/or personal
>issues involved, either. What I do s
* 2010-04-27 18:33, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I forgot to ask what'd be the best way to go forward for Plonistas?
> I really think that there should be some time for Plonistas to upgrade,
> which the current scheme does not allow for.
I personally use the unified installer, and it works fine; I liked
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:07:51AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> There's also buildbot of course, which I guess it the granddad of Python CI
> tools, kind of.
Yes, buildbot is the old-timer and has loads of features. As far as I
know, extractin
10 matches
Mail list logo
