* Sandro Tosi , 2010-04-14, 07:20:
I've seen that some modules/extensions are starting to ship
python3- packages, thus allowing to be installed for python3.x
interpreter. Well, I didn't see a discussion about that so I'm
starting one right away.
In particular I'd want to ask:
- was there a disc
On Apr 14, 2010, at 04:14 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>python-central seems to have some (at least rudimentary) support for
>3.X.
>
>I was told that python-support does not support 3.X (see bug #573560).
I am hoping that none will be necessary. PEP 3147 is very close to acceptance
and merging into t
Hi mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyamf".
* Package name: pyamf
Version : 0.5.1-1
Upstream Author : The PyAMF Project
* URL : http://pyamf.org/
* License : MIT
Section : python
It builds these binary packages:
python-pyamf - Act
Le mercredi 14 avril 2010 à 10:29 -0400, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> >I was told that python-support does not support 3.X (see bug #573560).
>
> I am hoping that none will be necessary. PEP 3147 is very close to acceptance
> and merging into the py3k upstream trunk, perhaps as soon as this Friday.
On Apr 14, 2010, at 07:01 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>Le mercredi 14 avril 2010 à 10:29 -0400, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
>> >I was told that python-support does not support 3.X (see bug #573560).
>>
>> I am hoping that none will be necessary. PEP 3147 is very close to
>> acceptance
>> and mergin
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:20:45AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> I've seen that some modules/extensions are starting to ship
> python3- packages, thus allowing to be installed for python3.x
> interpreter. Well, I didn't see a discussion about that so I'm
> starting one right away.
>
> In pa
[Jakub Wilk, 2010-04-14]
> * Sandro Tosi , 2010-04-14, 07:20:
>> I've seen that some modules/extensions are starting to ship
>> python3- packages, thus allowing to be installed for python3.x
>> interpreter. Well, I didn't see a discussion about that so I'm
>> starting one right away.
>>
>> In parti
On Apr 14, 2010, at 09:26 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[4] almost ready in pycompile, still waiting for
>http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0382/ (and 3147), though
PEPs 382 and 384 are next on my list.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
* Asheesh Laroia , 2010-04-14, 00:51:
Thanks! The package seems pretty good, and I think I will sponsor it.
Do you see anything else possibly troublesome as far as its Python
packaging?
I didn't notice anything unusual.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Miguel Landaeta scrisse:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyamf".
> [...]
> My motivation for maintaining this package is:
> I'm developing software that Depends on this. I would like to
> maintain this under Debian Python Modules Team.
As I was the one who opened the RFP, I'd be glad
10 matches
Mail list logo
