On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Christoph Egger
wrote:
> anatoly techtonik schrieb:
>>
>> Questions like "Debian Python Policy is all about GPL. Do I have to
>> release my Python package under GPL?". Most people (as you clearly
>> expressed) don't care, so upstream maintainers would just avoid D
please move your discussion to private or -legal
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-
Given that people are tired of discussing things they've already
decided for themselves I CC this to debian-legal.
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> The Debian policy is software with source code: the DocBook source document.
It is not clear why GPL notice doesn't stay in the
Quoting "anatoly techtonik" :
Given that people are tired of discussing things they've already
decided for themselves I CC this to debian-legal.
Addendum: Given that some Debian documents are released under the
terms of the GPL (e.g. our release notes), this discussion has only
little relation
Greetings!
I am the developer of OpenShot Video Editor (http://www.OpenShotVideo.com),
a Python video editor based on the MLT framework. My goal is to get
OpenShot included in the official Debian packages. But before OpenShot can
be included, I need to get the Python bindings for MLT included in
Squeze will release with Python 2.5 and Python 2.6, while Python 2.4 is
scheduled for removal when no packages will depend on it. When Python
2.6 will enter unstable, Python 2.4 will be no longer supported version
for module and extension building.
We're proposing a MBF for the following packages
6 matches
Mail list logo
