On Wed, Dec 09, 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Where is this git repository hosted? Or where can I get the current
> version of the policy as seen on the debian.org website?
Concerning the Python Policy, it's currently not handled in any VCS, so
I created a private git repo from the uploads of
Government Lists - U.S. | Canada: REACH YOUR KEY GOVERNMENT AUDIENCE EASILY!
I welcome you to join me on this business network.
REACH YOUR KEY GOVERNMENT AUDIENCE EASILY!
http://www.government-mailing-lists.com
Click the link below to Join:
http://governmentlists.ning.com/?x
Hi friends,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my package[0] or give me some advice
about this.
I heard that Debian Python team could sponsorship it.(I've tried on
Debian-mentors)
wixi: multi-platform wiki application for the desktop
URL : http://wixi.sourceforge.net/
Upst
Hi friends,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload my package[0] or give me some advice
about this.
I heard that Debian Python team could sponsorship it.(I've tried on
Debian-mentors)
wixi: multi-platform wiki application for the desktop
URL : http://wixi.sourceforge.net/
Upst
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:25:49AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I've been updating python-docutils to version 0.6. This version includes
> the separate man page and ODT writers that were previously packaged by Ben
> Finney and Michael Schutte, so I've made it conflict/provide/replace them,
> and
Il giorno Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:24:05 +0100
Loïc Minier ha scritto:
> To resurrect the Python Policy as a document reflecting required and
> recommended Python packaging practices, we prepared a set of patches.
Many thanks for that!
I entirely read the 1.9.0.0 draft, I've got some thoughts on it.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> To resurrect the Python Policy as a document reflecting required and
> recommended Python packaging practices, we prepared a set of patches.
> We started in private to provide a complete set of changes and avoid
> flames as much as
Hello,
Now I wish I could find time to write "de-facto" packaging tutorial in
wiki to see how the patched policy and original policy is going to
solve this real-world problem.
Thanks for collaboration.
--
anatoly t.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> [ MFT: debian-pyt...@
Luca Falavigna writes:
> ---
> | 1.2. Main packages
> |
> |At any time, the `python' package must ensure that the binary
> |`/usr/bin/python' is provided.
> ---
>
> This is currently not a binary, but a relative symlink pointing
> to ./pythonX.Y (where X.Y is the current supported Pyth
9 matches
Mail list logo
