Le mercredi 24 décembre 2008 à 00:48 +0100, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
> Imho if we are going to only version the debian dir, then I also don't
> see such a strong argument for git (or other distributed vcs). Since
> it will still need to fiddle with upstream tarball and also with
> debian/patches + q
Josselin Mouette writes:
> TTBOMK no other VCS is as smooth to operate as subversion *for
> Debian packages*. Only svn-buildpackage can handle correctly the
> versioning of the debian/ directory alone.
What mis-handlings of a separate ‘debian/’ directory do you know of in
the other ‘$VCS-buildpa
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Precisely. TTBOMK no other VCS is as smooth to operate as subversion
> *for Debian packages*. Only svn-buildpackage can handle correctly the
> versioning of the debian/ directory alone.
bzr bd works fine in this mode; did you try it out?
--
Loïc M
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 00:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> thanks for the points, I reacted to some.
so please accept my reply :)
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> P.S. bzed, POX, isn't it time to move our packaging to git?
>>
>> I'm none of them, but I'll speak anyway :) Bux
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:26:29PM +0100, Carlos wrote:
> Well, maybe we should distinguish between newcomers to the team and
> newcomers to VCS. A newcomer to the team could master one VCS, two or
> none of them, so it's impossible to know his (or her) preferences in
> advance. For a newcomer to
5 matches
Mail list logo
