Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 9/6/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one* > > person named as the responsible party for the packages. > > > > It's a fact of human psychology that if a collective group is named as > > the responsible party, then nob

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:06:56PM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > On 9/6/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one* > > > person named as the responsible party for the packages. > > > It's a fact of human psychology tha

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > So I myself chose to be among Uploaders and set Maintainer to DPMT, > > > because this more enforces team work and I like team work. > > > I had a discussion on #debian-devel about this, and "they" thought it > > was pretty stupid to have DPMT as up

Re: maintainer field

2007-09-06 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 9/6/07, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > So I myself chose to be among Uploaders and set Maintainer to DPMT, > > > > because this more enforces team work and I like team work. > > > > > I had a discussion on #debian-devel about this,