* Floris Bruynooghe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060828 12:02]:
> Secondly it should be noted that communication didn't go too good
> either since people in favour of the P-V fields didn't realise not
> everyone was happy with it and thought it was fine to go ahead with
> introducing it to unstable.
Well
Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 à 16:54 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> Well, the main objector was present in Mexico in the BOF, but started a
> bad campaing after being back from Mexico. That was not helpfull at all.
Remember. I already expressed concerns during the BoF itself. Then, it
turned out l
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:14:18PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 à 16:54 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > Well, the main objector was present in Mexico in the BOF, but started a
> > bad campaing after being back from Mexico. That was not helpfull at all.
> Remember.
Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 à 13:29 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> I think the only lesson is to not invite you to such meetings, because
> you'll piss on any attempt at building consensus anyway.
I think I have already told several times I won't participate again in
such a farce. You will not p
Hi,
This is version 1.05 of the draft, now with typo fixes, and
some initial policy support for partial upgrades for pure python
public modules that are trying to drop support for older versions of
python. The idea is that error cases are minimized if we do not drop
a version of python
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Copyright (c) 2006 Manoj Srivastava
>
>Revision History
>Revision 1.0.5 4^th November 2006
Setember?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
