(Matthias drew my attention to this thread. Sorry I'm a bit late ...)
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I haven't yet seen any reasoning why people are seeing that
> > information as "cluttering the database" or just as "ugly".
>
> Causing unrelated programs like d
Dear Debian developers,
My package, harvestman, has been marked with a severe bug related to
the new Python policy. I have made the necessary updation. Please
check it out at:
http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages
(1.4.6-3 is what you should get...)
In case there are problems, please let me kn
Kumar Appaiah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Dear Debian developers,
I'm not a DD, but maybe my comments will be useful
[...]
> In case there are problems, please let me know, so that I can correct
> them as necessary.
* Standards-Version is outdated (check upgrading-checklist.txt file)
* debian/pycompa
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:41 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mar 8 août 2006 00:18, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> current explicitely says that the package is only built for the current
> python version, and not for any other supported in debian. But I don't
> like that value for the following re
Hi,
Another day, another draft.
Here is the latest update for my take on the new Python
policy document. The current version, and future updates, are to be
found at http://www.golden-gryphon.com/software/manoj-policy/
I am including a text version below.
manoj
Le mar 8 août 2006 06:54, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> to write a wrapper script I wonder what might be the best possibility
> to find out the version numer of the running python interpreter. The
> wrapper script is of the type
>
>/var/lib/python-support/python${PYVER}/${package}/${realscr
Andreas Tille writes:
> Hi,
>
> to write a wrapper script I wonder what might be the best possibility
> to find out the version numer of the running python interpreter. The
> wrapper script is of the type
>
>/var/lib/python-support/python${PYVER}/${package}/${realscript}
>
> and I wonder, ho
Le mar 8 août 2006 00:18, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> § 2.3.3, 2.4.2, 2.5.3, 2.6.2:
> *here* the python$version alternative is correct,
> because /extensions/ can be used with a '/usr/bin/python' as soon
> as the python current version is in their supported range.
>
> so take the previous a
8 matches
Mail list logo
