Howdy,
This sounds like a good initiative. I'd like to add the
python-modules-team as uploader of pyvtk, a package I maintain.
Do I understand correctly that this implies I should put pyvtk into
the alioth subversion repository? If so: sign up user 'smr' for this.
Cheers,
-Steve
--
To UNSUB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for python-enchant (ITP #299783).
> Package is lintian/linda clean and builds in pbuilder.
>
> * Package name: python-enchant
> Version : 1.1.5
> Upstream Author : Ryan Kelly <[EMAIL P
> "Torsten" == Torsten Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Torsten> clean:: # hack (CDBS bug -- see #300149) -rm -rf build ==
Torsten> end and I'm not sure if the clean:: hack is still needed.
Hello,
I have tried to build pcapy without doing 'rm -rf build' but even with
-tc, i hav
Torsten Marek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> - the repo contains only the debian/ dir, but the mergeWithUpstream property
> is
> missing. You can set it with
> $ svn propset mergeWithUpstream 1 debian
> - you should use debhelper (>= 5) and set debian/compat to 5
done
> - have you considered switching t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> Torsten Marek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> - the repo contains only the debian/ dir, but the mergeWithUpstream property
>> is
>> missing. You can set it with
>> $ svn propset mergeWithUpstream 1 debian
>> - you should use debhelper
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> This sounds like a good initiative. I'd like to add the
> python-modules-team as uploader of pyvtk, a package I maintain.
Good!
> Do I understand correctly that this implies I should put pyvtk into
> the alioth subversion repository? If so: si
> I have prepared a new package using cdbs. However, i saw that there is
> already a debian/ directory into the upstream source, so i have removed
> it. I don't know if it was a good idea to do that ?
I think there is no fixed rule, and usually the best thing to do is coordinate
with upstream.
7 matches
Mail list logo