Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>>Again, the ability to distribute it as a single package is good,
>>
>>What "single package" are you talking
>>about? http://turbogears.org/download/ lists eggs and source packages for
>>*10* different Python projects that it depends on, written by five
>>different aut
Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 13:30 -0600, Ian Bicking a écrit :
> > You're reinventing the wheel. Really. This isn't a matter for the
> > Windows world, as users are accustomed to various, broken tools to
> > install stuff, and this one will probably be less broken than others.
> > But MacOS and
Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>If you patch my projects and remove the dependency checks,
>>I won't care that much (though it might be a nuisance); but if the Egg
>>metadata goes away, the projects will be broken.
>
>
> Removing the dependency checks entirely and replacing them with Debian
> dependenc
At 09:08 PM 11/27/2005 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Removing the dependency checks entirely and replacing them with Debian
dependencies is definitely an option, and I happen to prefer it slightly
to the necessity of adding empty .egg-info files to all python module
packages.
Just a reminder:
4 matches
Mail list logo
