Florent Rougon writes:
> Yes, but obviously you haven't read the Python policy draft
> (/usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.txt.gz) nor Josselin's proposal at
> http://people.debian.org/~joss/python/python-policy-draft.html/index.html.
> They are must reads for anyone packaging something that is
>
So, it would be /usr/share after all, as the .py modules in question are
not architecture dependent, but *are* private.
Correct?
Regards,
Paga
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:34:59AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Florent Rougon writes:
> > Yes, but obviously you haven't read the Python policy draft
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joss proposal is already incorporated into the proposed policy found
> in the python package.
>
> There is no reason why /usr/share/ should be disallowed. I
> changed the proposed policy to:
[private modules can now go to /usr/share/package/]
Good, tha
Marco Paganini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, it would be /usr/share after all, as the .py modules in question are
> not architecture dependent, but *are* private.
>
> Correct?
Yes, I think you can go for /usr/share/package.
--
Florent
debian-python Monday, November 17 2003
-
Did you know you can order presc'ription medications online
with no prior prescri'ption?
Medications like via'gra, ph'entermine, adip'ex, so'ma, and
ul'tram, and many more. Prescribed online by a U
5 matches
Mail list logo
